Over at the OpenScience Project, Dan Gezelter is trying to define what "open science" means. He thinks there are four key points:
- Transparency in experimental methodology, observation, and collection of data.
- Public availability and reusability of scientific data.
- Public accessibility and transparency of scientific communication.
- Using web-based tools to facilitate scientific collaboration.
What changes need to be made to this course to prepare people to do these things effectively?
Originally posted 2009-08-03 by Greg Wilson in Noticed.
comments powered by